<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zune 8 Vs iPod Nano Comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukmac.net/2007/12/06/zune-8-vs-ipod-nano-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukmac.net/2007/12/06/zune-8-vs-ipod-nano-comparison/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 07:22:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bodydetox</title>
		<link>http://ukmac.net/2007/12/06/zune-8-vs-ipod-nano-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-24791</link>
		<dc:creator>bodydetox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukmac.net/2007/12/06/zune-8-vs-ipod-nano-comparison/#comment-24791</guid>
		<description>iPod nano is very good as a walkaround mp3 player. my only complaint is that the included headphones lack good bass. I replaced it with the Sennheiser CX-300 and the sound was awesome. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iPod nano is very good as a walkaround mp3 player. my only complaint is that the included headphones lack good bass. I replaced it with the Sennheiser CX-300 and the sound was awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: really iPod Nano</title>
		<link>http://ukmac.net/2007/12/06/zune-8-vs-ipod-nano-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-9576</link>
		<dc:creator>really iPod Nano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukmac.net/2007/12/06/zune-8-vs-ipod-nano-comparison/#comment-9576</guid>
		<description>hi

Congratulations! this blog is very interesting and has information most important we invite you to visit our site &lt;a title=&quot;Best Buy Cheap iPod Nano Sale&quot; href=&quot;http://astore.amazon.com/Cheap.iPod.Nano.Accessories-20&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Apple iPod Nano Accessories&lt;/a&gt;.

thank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi</p>
<p>Congratulations! this blog is very interesting and has information most important we invite you to visit our site <a title="Best Buy Cheap iPod Nano Sale" href="http://astore.amazon.com/Cheap.iPod.Nano.Accessories-20" rel="nofollow">Apple iPod Nano Accessories</a>.</p>
<p>thank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPod Touch Fan</title>
		<link>http://ukmac.net/2007/12/06/zune-8-vs-ipod-nano-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-5761</link>
		<dc:creator>iPod Touch Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 04:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukmac.net/2007/12/06/zune-8-vs-ipod-nano-comparison/#comment-5761</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing.. a very long and detailed review.. iPod is still the best as the portable multimedia device. 
 
iPod Touch Fans last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipod-touch-case.blogspot.com/2008/07/google-talk-for-ipod-touch-and-iphone.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google Talk for iPod Touch and iPhone&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing.. a very long and detailed review.. iPod is still the best as the portable multimedia device. </p>
<p>iPod Touch Fans last blog post..<a href="http://ipod-touch-case.blogspot.com/2008/07/google-talk-for-ipod-touch-and-iphone.html" rel="nofollow">Google Talk for iPod Touch and iPhone</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://ukmac.net/2007/12/06/zune-8-vs-ipod-nano-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4171</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukmac.net/2007/12/06/zune-8-vs-ipod-nano-comparison/#comment-4171</guid>
		<description>I think that is Microsofts key problem Pete. The Zune just isn&#039;t significant enough to make people switch to Microsoft. Sure it does somethings that iPods dont, however it suffers from lack of compatibility with OSX and poor software. In order to make any headway at all into Apples market share they have to come up with a product that is better in a number of significant ways. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that is Microsofts key problem Pete. The Zune just isn&#039;t significant enough to make people switch to Microsoft. Sure it does somethings that iPods dont, however it suffers from lack of compatibility with OSX and poor software. In order to make any headway at all into Apples market share they have to come up with a product that is better in a number of significant ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete White</title>
		<link>http://ukmac.net/2007/12/06/zune-8-vs-ipod-nano-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4169</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukmac.net/2007/12/06/zune-8-vs-ipod-nano-comparison/#comment-4169</guid>
		<description>wow thats a long review. By the sounds of it the Zune sounds a pretty good device but as it doesn&#039;t work with OS X I will stick to my iPod. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow thats a long review. By the sounds of it the Zune sounds a pretty good device but as it doesn&#039;t work with OS X I will stick to my iPod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

